Home

|  Table of Contents

|         Court Forms  | Law Journals  |  Law Students | Law Dictionary  | News

     

CalliforniaAppeals.US

  BankruptcyCode.US
     

  California Appeals

  United States Law.US
          US Government
     

TITLE PAGE

  US Tax Center
 US Codes | State Codes Federal Civil Procedure

| FederalCriminalProcedure

|   War on Terror

| Lawyers
                                                 


A Legal and Business Portal

 

 

   
   
Social Security |  Finance   Hotels

US History

Restaurants

 Entertainment

World Directory

     

 

 


California Supreme
And Appellate Court
Opinions

 


California Superior Courts 
Local Court Rules  
My eLawOffice
University Law School     
California Criminal law
Legal News
First Amendment
Fourth Amendment
Fifth Amendment
Sixth Amendment



California Appeals
Standard of Review
Table of Contents

eBook Master Table of Contents
California Supreme And Appellate Court Opinions Directory     
 

 

 

       

Law Students

 

 
California
Appeals

Standard of Review-The Appelate court review-  result, not its rational.Paniagua v. Orange County

We agree with plaintiff that the pendency of the prior appeal tolled the running of the statute of limitations on his public entity claims.  Nevertheless we affirm because, disregarding the period during which the appeal was pending, plaintiff still exceeded the time required to satisfy the statute of limitations.  Although the trial court based its decision on other grounds, we review the result, not its rational.  (Estate of Beard (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 753, 776.)  Regardless of the reasons given for its decision, the trial court reached the correct result. 

                        Section 945.6 governs the timely filing of an action against a public entity.  With certain exceptions not relevant here, it declares, “any suit brought against a public entity on a cause of action for which a claim is required to be presented . . . must be commenced:  [¶] (1) If written notice [denying a claim] is given . . ., not later than six months after the date such notice is personally delivered or deposited in the mail.  [¶]

(2) If written notice is not given . . ., within two years from the accrual of the cause of action.”  (§ 945.6, subd. (a).) 

                        Defendants argue the six-month limitation period applies because they sent plaintiff rejection notices.  Not so.  Their notices rejected only plaintiff’s applications to present a late claim.  Neither rejection mentioned the claim presented along with the application.  Where a public entity rejects an application to present a late claim without mentioning the claim, the case is governed by the two-year provision.  (Mandjik v. Eden Township Hospital Dist. (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 1488, 1500; Jenkings v. County of Contra Costa (1985) 167 Cal.App.3d 152, 156.)  Thus, the applicable time period for plaintiff’s action was “two years from the accrual of the cause of action.”  (§ 945.6, subd. (a)(2).) 

 

spacer bar
 

Paniagua v. Orange County etc. G035809 3/29/07 CA4/3

Paniagua v. Orange County etc. G035809 3/29/07 CA4/3


California Appeals
Code Provisions
Rules of Court
Statutory Construction

Standard of Review


 

 

 

     

 

                     

        
  

  

 

 






 

       
 Law Students

  

  


eBook Master Table of Contents
California Supreme And Appellate Court Opinions Directory     
California Supreme And Appellate Court Opinions Directory


Thomas - Legislative Information on the Internet |Check Your Credit Score | UN Treaty Reference Guide
Directory of Medical Dictionaries |
California Injury (Torts) Law | Yaazoo! | Shopping
USA Entertainment.US | FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | United Statea News |
Travel |
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | iLaw Dictionary.Com |
Library of Congress |
United States Law Consumer Law  | USA Entertainment.US |
United States News
iBusiness Center.US | United States Law: Constitutional Law: Constitutions of  The World

California Contracts Law.Com | California Injury (Torts) Law | Advanced Trial Handbook
Phone Directories From Around the World New | California Law Revision Commission | Federal Courts
California Civil Procedure.Com | Advanced Trial Handbook-Ervin A. Gonzalez, Esq.
Yaazoo! | Abogados Latinos | United States History | Spanish | Federal Courts | Federal Rules of Evidence

Copyright 2003 by  © - CaliforniaAppeals.US™©  All Rights Reserved