Home

|  Table of Contents

|         Court Forms  | Law Journals  |  Law Students | Law Dictionary  | News

     

CalliforniaAppeals.US

  BankruptcyCode.US
     

  California Appeals

  United States Law.US
     

General Principles

  US Government
     

Table of Contents

  US Tax Center
 US Codes | State Codes Federal Civil Procedure

| FederalCriminalProcedure

|   War on Terror

| Lawyers
                                                 


A Legal and Business Portal

 

 

   
   
Social Security |  Finance   Hotels

US History

Restaurants

 Entertainment

World Directory

     

 

 


California Supreme
And Appellate Court
Opinions

 


California Superior Courts 
Local Court Rules  
My eLawOffice
University Law School     
California Criminal law 
California Jury Instructions
Legal News
First Amendment
Fourth Amendment
Fifth Amendment
Sixth Amendment



California Appeals
eBook
General Principles
 

eBook California Appeals Master Table of Contents   
Standard of Review-Table of Contents

Jul 07 2008 G038894
[PDF] [DOC]
Ball v. Fleetboston 6/5/08 CA4/3 Detailed case information

Ball v. FleetbostonG038894claim for declaratory relief which is “wholly derivative

 

 

       

Law Students

 

 
California
Appeals
California Appeals
eBook
General Principles

General Principles

General Principles-Wholly derivative action subject to demurrer sam as primary action-Ball v. Fleetboston
 

“36.  A controversy has arisen and now exists between Plaintiff and Plaintiff class members on the one hand, and Defendant Bank of America Corporation on the other hand, concerning their respective rights and duties in that Plaintiff and Plaintiff class members contend that the Defendant’s standard form pre‑printed credit card agreement contains provisions which are illegal, unconscionable and/or violate strong California public policy, whereas Defendant disputes these contentions and contends that none of the provisions of its standard form pre‑printed credit card agreement are illegal, unconscionable and/or violate strong California public policy.

“37.  Plaintiff desires a judicial determination of her rights and duties, and the rights and duties of the absent class members, and a declaration as to whether or not the arbitration provisions of the Defendant’s standard form pre‑printed credit card agreement are invalid because of illegality, unconscionability, and/or violation of strong California public policy.”

Thus, paragraph 36 of the proposed second amended complaint alleges that the contract provision for arbitration was illegal, unconscionable, and violated public policy, based on the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 34 – all of which relate to the alleged violation of the CLRA.

The statute permitting independent claims for declaratory relief provides, in relevant part:  “Any person interested under a written instrument . . . or under a contract, or who desires a declaration of his or her rights or duties with respect to another . . . may, in cases of actual controversy relating to the legal rights and duties of the respective parties, bring an original action or cross-complaint in the superior court for a declaration of his or her rights and duties in the premises, including a determination of any question of construction or validity arising under the instrument or contract.  He or she may ask for a declaration of rights or duties, either alone or with other relief; and the court may make a binding declaration of these rights or duties, whether or not further relief is or could be claimed at the time. . . . The declaration may be had before there has been any breach of the obligation in respect to which said declaration is sought.”  (Code Civ. Proc., § 1060, italics added.)

Because Code of Civil Procedure section 1060 permits an original action, and authorizes a claim for declaratory relief to be filed “alone,” Ball is correct in arguing she could pursue a claim for declaratory relief in the absence of another cause of action or other requested relief.  Ball is also correct in noting that the language of her proposed cause of action for declaratory relief establishes she is an interested person under a contract and seeks a declaration of her rights and duties under that contract. 

Fatal to Ball’s claim for declaratory relief is our conclusion, ante, regarding Ball’s CLRA claim.  Where a trial court has concluded the plaintiff did not state sufficient facts to support a statutory claim and therefore sustained a demurrer as to that claim, a demurrer is also properly sustained as to a claim for declaratory relief which is “wholly derivative” of the statutory claim.  (Ochs v. PacifiCare of California (2004) 115 Cal.App.4th 782, 794.)  As can be seen from the language of the proposed declaratory relief cause of action, quoted ante, it is wholly derivative of the proposed cause of action for violation of the CLRA.  The only declaration sought by the cause of action is a judicial declaration that the arbitration provisions of the credit card agreement are illegal and unconscionable, and violate public policy.  The CLRA cause of action requests that the enforcement of the arbitration provisions of the credit card agreement be enjoined, because they are unlawful and/or unconscionable. 

 


spacer bar
 

eBook Master Table of Contents   
Standard of Review-Table of Contents

 

Previous Page

 

 

     

 

                     

        
  

  

 

 






 

       
 Law Students

  

  


eBook Master Table of Contents  
Standard of Review-Table of Contents
California Supreme And Appellate Court Opinions Directory  
Garlock Sealing v. Nak Sealing-C050813-3/21/07 CA3
Definitions-issues actually litigated-Probate Code Murphy  v Murphy A115177M  
 


Thomas - Legislative Information on the Internet |Check Your Credit Score | UN Treaty Reference Guide
Directory of Medical Dictionaries |
California Injury (Torts) Law | Yaazoo! | Shopping
USA Entertainment.US | FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | United Statea News |
Travel |
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | iLaw Dictionary.Com |
Library of Congress |
United States Law Consumer Law  | USA Entertainment.US |
United States News
iBusiness Center.US | United States Law: Constitutional Law: Constitutions of  The World

California Contracts Law.Com | California Injury (Torts) Law | Advanced Trial Handbook
Phone Directories From Around the World New | California Law Revision Commission | Federal Courts
California Civil Procedure.Com | Advanced Trial Handbook-Ervin A. Gonzalez, Esq.
Yaazoo! | Abogados Latinos | United States History | Spanish | Federal Courts | Federal Rules of Evidence


Copyright 2003 by  © - CaliforniaAppeals.US™©  All Rights Reserved
 

Previous Page